Stock Markets
Daily Stock Markets News

How to bring workers back to DC without kicking out the poor


As president and chief investment officer of a commercial real estate firm in the District, Paul C. Dougherty would definitely like to see vacant downtown office buildings filled with tenants again. He’d be thrilled if more federal employees came into work five days a week, as they did before the pandemic.

But he doubts that they are going to give up the comforts of home anytime soon.

So, with the continuing vacancies eating away at city tax revenue and leading to deepening deficits, Dougherty came up with a plan to stop the hemorrhaging. To hear him tell it, the proposal that he presented at a recent meeting of the D.C. Tax Revision Commission would have the city coffers brimming with cash and make the city the most spectacular it has ever been.

“We would become the Singapore on the Potomac,” Dougherty told me.

In downtown D.C., a long-vacant historic building could pose opportunity

Singapore — a multicultural nation in Asia with a population just over 5 million — has an economy described as “business friendly” and features low taxes, a skilled workforce and advanced infrastructure. The schools and health-care services are good. Poverty is relatively low. The government has an authoritarian bent, to be sure, with a judiciary that prescribes caning, especially for repeat offenders, and the death penalty for certain acts of violence and drug offenses. The crime rate in Singapore is among the lowest in the world.

Dougherty, who heads the PRP real estate investment firm, said his interest is in the country’s economic success, not its penal system.

For starters, his proposal would cut individual income taxes in half — making D.C. taxes comparable to Virginia’s. He sees the Old Dominion as the District’s main competition for attracting high-salary residents and the corporations that employ them.

“It’s hard to believe that Virginia can be a few hundred yards away yet so highly successful, and we are in this prolonged downward spiral, and it all comes down to policies,” Dougherty told me. “Like it or not, Virginia is doing great. It is one of the top and best-run states in the country.”

To entice more corporate relocation to D.C. and really bring that Singapore bling to the Potomac, Dougherty would enact a tax incentive package identical to what was implemented several years ago in Puerto Rico, titled “Act 60.”

The key components of Act 60 are: a 4 percent flat tax for companies that move to D.C. for a minimum of 15 years; exemption from capital gains taxes; 75 percent abatement on real estate taxes; and 50 percent abatement on licensing taxes.

“I know people recoil when you mention the concept of tax cuts,” Dougherty told me, “but a low-tax environment doesn’t have to mean a handout to the rich. It could also mean you are doing a better job raising tax revenue, a better and more efficient job on spending, while drawing in more people who pay taxes.”

Dougherty declared that Act 60 “has been an overwhelming success in Puerto Rico, drawing hundreds of companies and billions in new capital to the island territory.”

But some Puerto Ricans worry that they will be priced out of their neighborhoods as investors buy up land to build luxury resorts. And the Internal Revenue Service is investigating whether some beneficiaries of the program committed fraud by falsely claiming to have met the requirements for a tax cut.

Nevertheless, a 2021 study commissioned by the Puerto Rico Department of Economic Development found that tax incentive package had resulted in 33,000 new jobs on the island, with an average yearly salary of $36,000 between 2012 and 2017. The median household income in Puerto Rico is about $22,000.

Without the tax breaks, Puerto Rico’s economic activity index would have been 2.6 points lower, according to the study.

Downtown D.C.’s large federal offices are underutilized, report finds

There is a likelihood that low-income residents in D.C. would also be hurt by such a tax scheme, just as they were when gentrification of the District drove up rents and home prices and resulted in thousands being displaced. D.C. leaders should have learned by now how to protect the city’s most vulnerable residents during economically tumultuous times.

What’s certain is that more challenging economic times lie ahead. Some of the ways city leaders are choosing to handle them will probably make matters worse. For instance, a projected budget shortfall has already been covered in part by a half-billion dollars that the city expects to make after increasing the number of traffic enforcement cameras from 140 to more than 500.

If the goal is attracting more people and businesses to the District, waging a war on cars seems like an odd way of…



Read More: How to bring workers back to DC without kicking out the poor

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.